

Help stop a painful and unnecessary animal surgery. "Convenience devocalization" cuts away an animal's vocal chords in a painful and even dangerous procedure to quiet dogs — and even cats — for mere convenience.
Massachusetts legislators now have an opportunity to end this unnecessary suffering.
Use your voice to help animals keep theirs. Urge Massachusetts to pass H.B. 344, ending convenience animal devocalization. Sign the petition today.
Suffering should never be inflicted on a companion animal for convenience. Dogs and cats are born with a bark or a meow as their most valuable and effective means of communication. Canine and feline vocalizations communicate distress, discomfort, or looming trouble that an animal will sense long before it becomes known to their human companions. When such vocalizations become a "nuisance", it's time for the people in charge of care for that animal to get to the heart of the trouble, which nearly always boils down to a need for proper socialization, interaction, exercise, and training.
What is convenience devocalization? Commonly known as debarking, this surgery is supposed to reduce the volume of a dog's bark or even a cat's meow by cutting off tissue from the animal's vocal chords. The procedure is invasive and requires general anesthesia. The procedure is outlawed as a form of mutilation in many states and other countries.
Even performed correctly by a qualified veterinarian, devocalization can be dangerous. Animals undergoing the surgery risk painful complications and side-effects that can last throughout the remainder of the animal's lifetime, including:
· chronic cough, gagging, even choking
· pain when swallowing
· internal bleeding
· increased risk of infection
· trouble breathing from lung complications
· scar tissue which can lead to additional surgeries
Not only can this procedure leave an animal in pain and with compromised immunity, it does not solve the original problem. Debarking does not eradicate the animal's compulsion to be vocal, which is usually a sign of lack of proper socialization and training, stress, boredom, fear, or frustration. The procedure does not solve the behavioral factors that drove an animal to bark or meow in the first place, and now that animal is further hampered in trying to communicate with their caregiver. Worse, without a vocal outlet, those behavioral factors can lead to other unwanted behaviors as the animal attempts to communicate or relieve its frustration.
"Debarking" should never be used as a convenience for people; it is a serious surgery that should be used only when medically necessary. Urge Massachusetts legislator to support H.R. 344 to end this practice.
Dear Massachusetts Lawmaker, I am writing to ask you to support Massachusetts bill H.B. 344, to ban convenience devocalization of dogs and cats. Devocalization must not be done for the sake of convenience. It is an invasive and risky surgery, even when performed by a qualified veterinarian. The procedure can leave side-effects that last the remainder of the animal's lifetime, including chronic coughing, gagging, and choking; internal bleeding, trouble breathing, scar tissue, and increased risk of infection. "Nuisance" barking and other problematic animal vocalizations are rooted in a lack of proper socialization, training, interaction, and exercise, or an owner or breeder who doesn't understand the needs or genetic disposition of their animals. Our convenience should never be a reason to put animals at risk of a lifetime of pain and frustration. We must all find another way to address the root of the problem. There are ethical principles of greater importance than the convenience of people. We must address the problem of nuisance animal vocalization with other means, not via an expedient but unnecessary and potentially dangerous surgical procedure. Please support H.B. 344. Thank you for your time. |
| Aug 25, 2010 scott mcclelland |
| Jul 29, 2010 Doloris Petroniero |
| Jul 26, 2010 Christoph Kienle |
| Jul 22, 2010 Mario Velarde |
| Jul 18, 2010 Alice Rodrigues SHAME ON THESE SO CALLED PET OWNERS!! |
| Jul 17, 2010 nikki giovanelli please help them |
| Jul 14, 2010 Nona Hendrickx |
| Jul 11, 2010 Wendy Weisel It is just disgusting that people would do this to any living thing. Would you take the voice away from a human?! I did not know this was even something one could do and I am just appalled! |
| Jul 8, 2010 (Name not displayed) HORRIBLE STUFF!!!! GET THIS FIXED ASAP!!!! |
| Jul 7, 2010 carla long |
| Jun 25, 2010 nicole perez |
| Jun 23, 2010 Savannah Gullett |
| May 31, 2010 scott weese people shouldn't buy the pet, or have one if they believe this is "humane" or even a treatment that should be allowed. |
| May 27, 2010 (Name not displayed) |
| May 25, 2010 Carol Scott |
| May 19, 2010 Alexandra Urban Horrible!!! |
| May 17, 2010 pamela gutierrez |
| May 16, 2010 Sherri Schultz |
| May 14, 2010 (Name not displayed) |
| May 14, 2010 (Name not displayed) |
| May 13, 2010 Kaitlyn Sander |
| May 13, 2010 (Name not displayed) |
| May 11, 2010 Sky Curtis |
| May 10, 2010 Elizabeth Rescigno I donot understand why humans act so disgusting. Why must everything tahts beautiful be destroyed. I am so ashamed. |
| May 10, 2010 Helen Nourse |
| May 9, 2010 Judy Malhotra |
| May 9, 2010 Jessica Wozniak |
| May 6, 2010 LAURIE DAY |
| May 6, 2010 Frances Onesti |
| May 6, 2010 Ellen Carr that is totally wroung the need to put a stop doing stuff like that is sick and inhumane |
| May 6, 2010 VIVIAN LOMBARDOZZI |
| May 6, 2010 andrea f |
| May 6, 2010 Caroline Caruso |
| May 6, 2010 Pamela McKinney |
| May 5, 2010 Peggy Ranney |
| May 5, 2010 Sylvain Quirion |
| May 5, 2010 Valerie Pope |
| May 5, 2010 Laurel Coutts |
| May 5, 2010 Gordon Coutts |
| May 5, 2010 charlie sclafani this is horrible |
| May 5, 2010 Nikki Vega |
| May 5, 2010 Linda Coutts |
| May 5, 2010 Valerie Boppre |
| May 5, 2010 Donna Ryan |
| May 5, 2010 Rachael Humbert This is crazy. People are nuts. I wonder if an owner realizes how 'inconveinent' it will be when he is in dire straights and needs his dog to call for help, but he can't because his barking was nuisance. Is it a nuisance now? |
| May 5, 2010 Danielle Burt |
| May 5, 2010 penny vorderkunz Horrible cruelty. Please stop this horrific and shameful display. |
| May 5, 2010 Susan Osmers |
| May 5, 2010 richard Lane I can think of quite a few Lawmakers, that need convenience devocalizations |
| May 5, 2010 kelle heck |