The Hunger Site The Breast Cancer Site The Child Health Site The Literacy Site The Rainforest Site The Animal Rescue Site
 
 
 
 
Help Raise an Orphaned Bear Cub
H.B.344 was signed into law! Thank you for your help in making sure cats and dogs won't endure frivolous devocalization!
Stop Convenience Devocalization in Massachusetts
Final Signature Count: 39,948
Sponsored by: The Animal Rescue Site

Help stop a painful and unnecessary animal surgery. "Convenience devocalization" cuts away an animal's vocal chords in a painful and even dangerous procedure to quiet dogs — and even cats — for mere convenience.

Massachusetts legislators now have an opportunity to end this unnecessary suffering.

Use your voice to help animals keep theirs. Urge Massachusetts to pass H.B. 344, ending convenience animal devocalization. Sign the petition today.

Suffering should never be inflicted on a companion animal for convenience. Dogs and cats are born with a bark or a meow as their most valuable and effective means of communication. Canine and feline vocalizations communicate distress, discomfort, or looming trouble that an animal will sense long before it becomes known to their human companions. When such vocalizations become a "nuisance", it's time for the people in charge of care for that animal to get to the heart of the trouble, which nearly always boils down to a need for proper socialization, interaction, exercise, and training.

What is convenience devocalization? Commonly known as debarking, this surgery is supposed to reduce the volume of a dog's bark or even a cat's meow by cutting off tissue from the animal's vocal chords. The procedure is invasive and requires general anesthesia. The procedure is outlawed as a form of mutilation in many states and other countries.

Even performed correctly by a qualified veterinarian, devocalization can be dangerous. Animals undergoing the surgery risk painful complications and side-effects that can last throughout the remainder of the animal's lifetime, including:

· chronic cough, gagging, even choking
· pain when swallowing
· internal bleeding
· increased risk of infection
· trouble breathing from lung complications
· scar tissue which can lead to additional surgeries

Not only can this procedure leave an animal in pain and with compromised immunity, it does not solve the original problem. Debarking does not eradicate the animal's compulsion to be vocal, which is usually a sign of lack of proper socialization and training, stress, boredom, fear, or frustration. The procedure does not solve the behavioral factors that drove an animal to bark or meow in the first place, and now that animal is further hampered in trying to communicate with their caregiver. Worse, without a vocal outlet, those behavioral factors can lead to other unwanted behaviors as the animal attempts to communicate or relieve its frustration.

"Debarking" should never be used as a convenience for people; it is a serious surgery that should be used only when medically necessary. Urge Massachusetts legislator to support H.R. 344 to end this practice.

Dear Massachusetts Lawmaker,

I am writing to ask you to support Massachusetts bill H.B. 344, to ban convenience devocalization of dogs and cats.

Devocalization must not be done for the sake of convenience. It is an invasive and risky surgery, even when performed by a qualified veterinarian. The procedure can leave side-effects that last the remainder of the animal's lifetime, including chronic coughing, gagging, and choking; internal bleeding, trouble breathing, scar tissue, and increased risk of infection.

"Nuisance" barking and other problematic animal vocalizations are rooted in a lack of proper socialization, training, interaction, and exercise, or an owner or breeder who doesn't understand the needs or genetic disposition of their animals. Our convenience should never be a reason to put animals at risk of a lifetime of pain and frustration. We must all find another way to address the root of the problem.

There are ethical principles of greater importance than the convenience of people. We must address the problem of nuisance animal vocalization with other means, not via an expedient but unnecessary and potentially dangerous surgical procedure.

Please support H.B. 344.

Thank you for your time.

Signatures
Aug 25, 2010 scott mcclelland
Jul 29, 2010 Doloris Petroniero
Jul 26, 2010 Christoph Kienle
Jul 22, 2010 Mario Velarde
Jul 18, 2010 Alice Rodrigues SHAME ON THESE SO CALLED PET OWNERS!!
Jul 17, 2010 nikki giovanelli please help them
Jul 14, 2010 Nona Hendrickx
Jul 11, 2010 Wendy Weisel It is just disgusting that people would do this to any living thing. Would you take the voice away from a human?! I did not know this was even something one could do and I am just appalled!
Jul 8, 2010 (Name not displayed) HORRIBLE STUFF!!!! GET THIS FIXED ASAP!!!!
Jul 7, 2010 carla long
Jun 25, 2010 nicole perez
Jun 23, 2010 Savannah Gullett
May 31, 2010 scott weese people shouldn't buy the pet, or have one if they believe this is "humane" or even a treatment that should be allowed.
May 27, 2010 (Name not displayed)
May 25, 2010 Carol Scott
May 19, 2010 Alexandra Urban Horrible!!!
May 17, 2010 pamela gutierrez
May 16, 2010 Sherri Schultz
May 14, 2010 (Name not displayed)
May 14, 2010 (Name not displayed)
May 13, 2010 Kaitlyn Sander
May 13, 2010 (Name not displayed)
May 11, 2010 Sky Curtis
May 10, 2010 Elizabeth Rescigno I donot understand why humans act so disgusting. Why must everything tahts beautiful be destroyed. I am so ashamed.
May 10, 2010 Helen Nourse
May 9, 2010 Judy Malhotra
May 9, 2010 Jessica Wozniak
May 6, 2010 LAURIE DAY
May 6, 2010 Frances Onesti
May 6, 2010 Ellen Carr that is totally wroung the need to put a stop doing stuff like that is sick and inhumane
May 6, 2010 VIVIAN LOMBARDOZZI
May 6, 2010 andrea f
May 6, 2010 Caroline Caruso
May 6, 2010 Pamela McKinney
May 5, 2010 Peggy Ranney
May 5, 2010 Sylvain Quirion
May 5, 2010 Valerie Pope
May 5, 2010 Laurel Coutts
May 5, 2010 Gordon Coutts
May 5, 2010 charlie sclafani this is horrible
May 5, 2010 Nikki Vega
May 5, 2010 Linda Coutts
May 5, 2010 Valerie Boppre
May 5, 2010 Donna Ryan
May 5, 2010 Rachael Humbert This is crazy. People are nuts. I wonder if an owner realizes how 'inconveinent' it will be when he is in dire straights and needs his dog to call for help, but he can't because his barking was nuisance. Is it a nuisance now?
May 5, 2010 Danielle Burt
May 5, 2010 penny vorderkunz Horrible cruelty. Please stop this horrific and shameful display.
May 5, 2010 Susan Osmers
May 5, 2010 richard Lane I can think of quite a few Lawmakers, that need convenience devocalizations
May 5, 2010 kelle heck
495 Standard Shipping Every Day
Paws Galore Comfort Slippers

Paws Galore™ Comfort Slippers

Everyday Value: $15
Pakistan Floods - Help Animals Now

Pakistan's grazing animals need your help! Donate Today!
Dogvergnugen T-Shirt

Dog Is Good!

Dogvergnugen T-Shirt
Frontline Plus Flea and Tick Control for Cats

Frontline® Plus Flea and Tick Control for Cats
GIMMEFIVE Coupon - 5 Off 25

Limited Time
Pet Remembrance Paw Bracelet

Pet Remembrance Paw Bracelet

One of our Favorites!
Paw Print Coffee Press

Paw Print Coffee Press

Now Only $12!
Whisker Therapy Cat Tee

"My Therapist Has Whiskers" Cat Tee
Green Amber Celtic Necklace

Green Amber Celtic Necklace

$16 Special!
Purple Paw Cold Pack

Weekly Special!

Now Only $2.95!


Daily Deal!TM Clearance - get them before they're gone. Tick Tock! Click Quick for Special Values Facebook Fan Freebies Play our Games That Give™ - Over 25 games to choose from!
About Our Projects Take Action! Campaigns Rescued Pets Photo Contest Rescued Pets Contest Rules Rescued Animal Stories Games That Give Animals in the News Games That Give Shelter Challenge Results GreaterGood Blog Crazy Lazy Pet Photos Touch To Give iPhone App Pet Care Wildfacts A-Z